🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.